Template:Did you know nominations/Zufar ibn al-Harith al-Kilabi

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewing guide WMFLabs Dup detector Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Disambig links External links Find sources (notability)

Zufar ibn al-Harith al-Kilabi

• ( Back to T:TDYK
• Article history )

• ... that Zufar al-Kilabi was given a high place in the Umayyad court and army in return for abandoning the rebellion of Ibn al-Zubayr?

• Reviewed: The Best Intentions

Created by Al Ameer son (talk). Self-nominated at 20:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 20:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 7601 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (9.1% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• Some overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 126 characters
  • ✗ Al Ameer son has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• New enough, long enough, neutral, sourced, no close paraphrasing found, hook is short enough, sourced. Good to go, once QPQ is done. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

• Article (New):
• Article (Long enough):
• Article (Within policy):
• Hook (Format):
• Hook (Content):
• QPQ: Pending...
• Images:

Overall: Impressive article. Once you get that QPQ done, you're all ready to go!.--Coin945 (talk) 16:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

• Adding icon for current status of nomination (missing QPQ). Otherwise, the bot sees the most recent icon, a tick, and assumes that the nomination has been passed, which it hasn't. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Ping The QPQ's now done, excuse me for the long delay. --Al Ameer (talk) 21:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

• Pinging Coin945 to continue the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

• good to go.--Coin945 (talk) 23:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)